Latest food news.

I have got to confess i have not posted on my own blog for a while, only i seem to read it but, i feel i should apologise anyway, so sorry.

So food news, As i was saying in March, we are looking forward to a massive engineered foodcrisis. And the guide to this is called the “codex alimentarius”.

What an fantastic name for a document that outlines the method of murder of around half the planet. It sounds so doomsdayish, it says

‘this document is clearly of such historical importance that we have named it in Latin’.

It apparently means food code or food book depending on your own interpretation, but what actually is it.

Well it began in 1963, set up by the FAO and the WHO, The goal of the ‘codex alimentarius’ is to have global food standardisation. Complete control from seeds to growing and then through to the additives and pesticides then preperation, packaging and  labeling  and finally to consumption and probably beyond.

This is not just for some food but for every single food source on the planet, farmed or wild, cultivated or natural.

No hidden agenda, all perfectly open and published. The range and power of this global food code is awesome. Not awesome like your new trainers are awesome, but more they cause a fearful awe.

One tactic is to patent all organisms. Sell nature to the pharmaceutical companies, you wanna grow basil in your garden, you gotta pay a license.

Another Outlaw vitamins and health suppliments/remedies. The Pill makers don’t want us using nature for our own good, so best make it illegal.

You should read about then and their plans as i say it is frightening.

Its what they dont tell you that is most upsetting

This one goes out to all the media and every journalist.

Shame on you and i dont know how you sleep.

Every day they conspire to not tell you whats going on, every day they must agree on a common lie. You don’t believe me, ok.

If Chinese beating free tibet monks is bad, and deserved of such coverage, then surely New york Cops beating them at the gates of the UN would be of equal importance.

Doesn’t seem so, cos i don’t see no paper or radio or website telling me about this.

So i have written the BBC and asked them for an answer, why cover one but not the other.

I am not expecting an answer

Just a wee update, it is now two weeks since the beatings, still no mass media shout outs. I have contacted Jon Williams and Peter Barron, both editors at the BBC, in the vain hope that I can find out why this isn’t a story.

Newsnight, the Economy and how not to ask a question.

I read the BBC website a lot but have long since sent the telly to the dump, so its rare i see any of their television. the other night though i was at a friends and watched newsnight.

Standard stuff really, there was paxman and two others doing their very best not to talk about the economy whilst pretending to talk about the Economy.

It was very funny for those who missed it.

At one point on of the experts pointed out that the Dow jones had actually ended up on the day, so things are good, and Paxman just looked at him and said, i suppose so.

I nearly fell from the sofa laughing.

We have 60% of Americans using their credit cards to cover their morgages, we have banks collapsing, gold and oil breaking records, well oil breaking records. The dollar is fast on it’s way to being worthless paper and we have two wars to fund whilst we do this. So as the markets collapse our governments loan the Yuppies our tax and savings, flooding the stock exchanges in a hope to stabalise them, instead though they only prolong the inevitable.

But hey the Dow was a few points up for a day last week so no worries there.

It brings me back to the same question.

Are they idiots, are they complicit or is it forced ?

At least we don’t have to put up with evanomics any more

The BBC and the CFR and Usama bin laden

So the most evil, dangerous and evil man on the planet, Usama bin laden, has threatened the west with a new ‘audio tape’.

I am most amazed that anyone still believes this crap about Usama at all, but not surprised that the BBC have their mucky hands all over the propoganda.

The web article regarding Usamas new message, starts by being decent enough by saying that the message is ‘purported’ to be from Bin laden, So does the story cover the issue of his changing identity, nope. Does it then cover that he was, and lets face it, probably is, a CIA asset. Nope.

We get instead a brief outline of the message and it threats, then starts the propaganda.

The first agent of illusion is Jonathan Beal, his job is to disassociate Usamas threat from the Iraq War, So if bombs do go off it is definatly nothing to do with us being in iraq, its only to do with them hating our freedoms and nothing else. The timing of the message is more likely to be in relation to Muhammads birthday. Nice bit of misdirection, Well done Jonathan.

The next handler we are introduced to is a great fella called John Pike, head of think tank Globalsecurity.org, he introduces us to the mindset of Usama. He is directing his followers to Europe and he is trying to stir up his followers into attacking our freedom of speech, cos thats what they hate about u, they hate our freedoms.

So all in all a lovely piece.

Usamas an evil so and so, he hates that we have free speech so he is telling all his followers to attack Europe.

One little point though,

John Pike - This guy is introduced to us as some kind of even handed arbiter, an expert on global security and as he is in a think tank and in the business world, his views will be politically independent.

So who is John Pike, Well he seems to be a bit of a space and Nuclear boffin, as well as having a say in and about world affairs, In the 80’s he was seen as a rising star of the New American Establishment. he has sat on countless quasi govt orgs. He is also on the CFR, The Council on Foreign Relations.

So last week we had the BBC giving Josette Sheerin a chance to warn us about Food, and this week John Pike, Both CFR.

Once again it begs the question, are the BBC journalists just bad at their job, or are they doing this with purpose.

I know a lot of BBC employees, some are family and my bet is that most of them are just blissfully unaware that they are meant to fight for the truth, they just do as they are told and hope their contract gets renewed, with a few of the higher ups being the ones with purpose.

Same guy, Different spin

Hashim Thaci, you know him, don’t you. New leader of the newly independent Kosovo. A modern fairytail of people power and democracy in action.

Osama bin-laden now i am sure you know him, Most evil man on the planet, etc etc etc.

But the two of them have the most fascinating similarities.

Both drug dealers, both terrorists, they even fought together, well same war anyway.
Yet we are given such a different spin on them. Osama bad, Hashim good.

Don’t get it myself.

Its not the votes that count, its who counts the votes

So in 2000, the BBC got together with Greg Pallast in a joint investigation into voter fraud at the US elections, th result was a series of newsnight reports and a book, the best democracy money can buy’. All good there, the bbc does its job well. They uncover mass fraud in florida and the use of electronic voting machines in this fraud.

Fast forward 8 years, Us primaries, massive reports of voter fraud, in nearly every primary, nearly every primary vote being contested at one level or another, and we have Bev Harris, an investigative journalist who specialises in voter fraud, uncovering incredible evidence. she followed the votes as they were driven from the polling station and into a midnight meeting in the middle of thdesert with a bunch of guys in a truck. She found resealable ballot boxes. She has the evidence to sink this issue.

A quick check of the BBC website, dont see anything there, maybe Justin Webb will bring it up on his blog, nope.

So in 8 short years we have gone from the BBC funding investigations in voter fraud to the BBC doing its very best to make sure this election is about Obama and Hilary and nothing else.

The Open Conspiracy

Conspiracy theories. There are two words that can cause a lot of arguments. I often get accused of believing in conspiracy theories, this often lead to being accused of believing some fantastic things. Don’t get me wrong, I am no Goyin, and hence have a slightly different view of how things are.

But here is the rub on conspiracy theories. By definition they exist everyday, everywhere. Every shop, and business conspire to sell you goods, the second two or more people get together and ‘plan’ something, they are involving themselves in a conspiracy. My  point is the phrase is used more for its insinuated meaning than its actual meaning.

But I think we all know what we are talking about when we hear ‘conspiracy theories’. We are talking JFK ,9/11, the Bilderbergers, the new world order. I have never been attacked on the evidence of any of these issues,  just the concept of believing in them. The Bilderberg group is a classic example.

I get accused of believing that the powerful of the world all get together behind closed doors and conspire to influence and guide world events to there own use. Clearly a crazy idea. But they do, its called the bilderberg group,  and they  openly admit  the existence of it, no one will discuss it, but they will at least admit they go to the meetings.

There is no secret conspiracy, its a very open and straightforward conspiracy. Those who have been party to it over the years have been very good and decent, and happily published everything you would need to know about who they are, what they are doing and what they are planning on doing.  They are even very honest about how they will keep us all in the dark about it and then have the gall to openly mock us at times about it.

So yeah go for it, ignore the folks who cry wild about this stuff, but please realise how stupid you look in our eyes, most folks who argue against basic concept of conspiracies existing, at a highest levels of our society, are like a child arguing the case for Santa Clause. It’s kind of sweet that you join in but please spend just half an hour checking before you say anything.

Its what they don’t tell you that is most interesting

I had never heard of Michael Todd before today,First story on the BBC website when i checked, amazingly the BBC failed to mention in their report that this was the guy who was investigating the CIA only a few months ago, and now he is found dead.

The details of this have not come out but i wonder if it will be similar to Dr. Kelly. but its hats off to the BBC for not mentioning Michael Todds CIA link and again well done for pushing the whole suicide story.

Nearly every other news organisation on the planet mentions his CIA link, but not the BBC. Which means they either, again , are very bad at their jobs, or when they sat down at the editorial meeting they thought ‘ thats not important, best not mention it’.

Today, they also missed questions on 9/11 being asked in the European parliament. (in a similar way to them not noticing the japanese parliament discussing it). Again it begs the question, who are these editors and why do they consistently misrepresent the truth.

Dont trust the BBC

I dont know if i could put it more plainly. Yes our dearly beloved auntie beeb is in cahoots with the 21Centuary Nazis.

As much as it pains me I am afraid the BBC are no longer interested in anything like reporting the truth, and I am beginning to wonder if they ever have. I know the arguments against such a thing happening, years of trust and loyalty, years of them harranging the govt of the day andyears of being what is accepted as the single greatest news organisation on earth.Sadly this is a lot of nonsense mainly promoted by them.

If you want any proof of the turning of the BBC, just look at the 1000 or so questions they have been asked about 9/11 on their editors blog, they apparently don’t even deem a response in the eyes of the BBC. Or ask them for information on any of the stories they omit to cover. The last few months have thrown up some corkers.

Ask about the missing nukes from the minot air base when they were on transit to barkinsdale.

Ask about the 6 underwater internet cables that basically shut iran off from the online work.

Go back a few years and ask about the 100 year gagging order on the Thomas Hamilton Enquiry.

Ask them anything about our present economic outlook. - This one I find most fascinating. The western economy is going to take a hit this year, that is going to make the depression in the 20’s look like sunday school. The economists know it, but the media downplay it, all the talk of rescues and recessions from them.

So as the quarterlys get reported watch for the first real crumbling of this financial facade, when the next set of quarterlies come out, the s**t will really hit the fan. What most worrying for us in the U.K. is that our Economy is now a financial based one, what a good idea that was.  I find it hilarious that the BBC response to all this is ‘evanomics’.

My new favorite  question is to ask them, why they have never thought it would be interesting to tell us that Prescott Bush, The Granddaddy of the Bush Clan , went to Jail for Treason in WWII for colluding with the enemy. He helped finance the Nazi War machine and then attempted a fascist coup in the United States, all historical record.

So why have the BBC never thought to mention this?

What upsets me most is that the BBC is run by people who should be doing a job on our behalf, the present set of editors, managing editors, senior editors etc etc etc, have basically turned a blind eye on their watch. This frightens me the most, They are either doing it for some personal gain, be it financial or the caressing of the ego that secret knowledge and power can give you, I know something you don’t and all that, or they are doing under the duress of the barrel of a gun.

If they are under the gun, all i can say is, this is a time for heroes, and we need some over there, if not, then may God understand and forgive them for their complicity in all this.

So c’mon BBC editors, prove me wrong.

Is this how they will come for us

When they come at your front door,

how you gonna come,

with your hands on your head

or on the trigger of a gun

 Guns of Brixton by The Clash  

I often think about those 4 lines,  at the moment its the ‘come at your front door, bit that has me.

 I can see the Global Govt, setting up for Martial Law in the US. the signs are clear, all the groundwork has been laid and it seems like we looking at a summer nuke for one of the south eastern cities. It will be false flag of course, brought to us by the usual suspects, the same faces that crop up surrounding 9/11 will crop up again.  So the plan seems to be some nuclear self harm followed by martial law.  

What has confused me is how they are going to come for the likes of me. truthers who refuse to join in with the goyin perspective, There are many like me and Ii know they will come for us, they have followed Hitlers plan to the letter so dissenters and such will be in the cattlecars eventually. How will they do it, well i think they played there hand this week, and once again hats off to them. Once you understand that single decisions are made at the top a filter through to us you start to see the same guiding hand coming at you from many sources. 

 So here is my thinking, they are going to false flag more attacks on recruiting stations in the US and over here in the uk they will be pushing this whole ‘abusing of troops in the uniform’ gambit. Both stories pop up within a few days of each other, In the US the times square bomber has already been identified as ‘an anarchist’, the media are pushing that he is from an anti-war group that he has a gripe with the government, etc, etc, etc. Over here out of the blue, we have Gordon Brown kicking up a fuss about troops being abused in when in uniform. The local police say they have no complaints and know of no such incidents, the army can’t actually identify any such incidents, although i am sure it does happen don’t get me wrong. The point is that this looks like it could be there way of getting folks like me off the street and into detention centers, which i am not too keen on considering it is legal to sexually torture those detained.

 So is this how they will come for us, who knows it could just them testing the water who can tell.